Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

The Great American Dumb-Down

 

Photo By Roman Eisele - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=87283346

MISEDUCATION

There is a growing and disturbing trend of anti-intellectual elitism in American culture. It’s the dismissal of science, of the arts, and humanities and their replacement by entertainment, self-righteousness, ignorance, and deliberate gullibility. –Ray Williams, Wired for Success article July 07, 2014

The Texas Senate is pushing for the enforcement of its legislator’s preferred religion on the state’s children by requiring that the Christian scripture’s Ten Commandments be to be displayed in public schools. Senate Bill 10 passed on a 20-1 vote along party lines. Earlier. Senate Bill 11, allowing students to take time from the serious work of study to pray- a form of wishful thinking- to infringe on the three Rs. The bill ignored the fact that students are allowed to pray without the Senate’s input; they just cannot be guided or forced into the ritual by school staff. The dumb-down crowd pushing for a Taliban-like enforcement of their beliefs will not likely stop at mere displays and private time.

With the sweeping victory of Donald Trump into the White House and his party taking majorities in the nation’s senate and House of Representatives, such extreme politics have become the norm, not the exception. We can expect to see further bills from more conservative states introducing similar measures if the Texas effort succeeds and, being that it is Texas that those states will emulate, we can count on an authoritarian frenzy to sweep all but the most scientifically literate locales.

The United State has a long history of such attempts to dumb down the citizenry. Early in our history, Congress rejected George Washington’s proposal for a national university because it might offend the dominance of Christian universities in the nation’s educational system, 1 thus beginning America’s long flirtation with what journalist Charles P. Pierce called’’ “Idiot America.”2 The drive to force a bronze-age knowledge system onto the public, combined with the undercurrent of anti-intellectualism that rises to the surface with alarming frequency and driven with doctrinal Christianity’s obsessive need to force it’s dogmatic beliefs onto the world go back in U.S. history at least to the time of the First Great Awakening that captured the fledging nation between the 1730s and the 1770s. Christine Leigh Heyrman at the National Humanities Center writes: “Throughout the colonies, conservative and moderate clergymen questioned the emotionalism of evangelicals and charged that disorder and discord attended the revivals.”3 Now, some 275 years later, those conservatives embrace the very emotion over intellect they once rejected as a necessary component of political ideology. “Facts don’t care about your feelings,” someone once said, with feeling.

Look into any talk radio program, read any social media meme promoting far-right propaganda (and some from the left-- those devious libtards are waking up) and you will find appeals to emotion; Outrage, anger, revenge, hate… One might search for days without seeing a single message designed to stir the intellect.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'” ― Isaac Asimov

Thomas Jefferson “was the first distinguished victim of a decisively anti-intellectual attack, and the assault on him (leveled principally by Federalist leaders and members of the established clergy) set a precedent for subsequent efforts to render an active, curious mind either trivial and ridiculous or evil and dangerous...The capacity for reflective, creative, and critical thought, finely honed argumentation, and public persuasion—talents one might other­wise assume well recommend a candidate for the office of president—were transformed into the gravest of liabilities.”4

 

A highly influential, if not seminal, work by Richard Hofstadter, defined anti-intellectualism as: “a resentment and suspicion of the life of the mind and of those who are considered to represent it; and a disposition constantly to minimize the value of that life”.

By that definition, anti-intellectualism has reached a fever pitch in modern American life. Consider that…

  •     One-third of Americans believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible. “Nearly 6 in 10 believe that the bloody predictions of the Book of Revelations—which involve the massacre of everyone who does not accept Jesus as the Messiah—will come true.”1
  •     Two-thirds of Americans want creationism taught alongside of evolution in public schools.
  •     Forty-eight percent accept any form of evolution—even theistic evolution.
  •     Twenty-six percent accept Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.
  •     An astounding 42 percent believe all life has existed in their present form since the beginning of time.1a. 5.

Those numbers a scary, but they are not the whole story. Though it appears that Americans are prone to magical thinking based on a particular religion as expressed in a particular sacred text, yet “A majority of American adults…cannot name the four Gospels or identify Genesis as the first book of the Bible.1b

A 1998 study from the University of Texas found that one-fourth of public-school biology teachers believe that humans and dinosaurs inhabited the earth at the same time. Be afraid for our public-school students. Be very afraid.

The battle to keep knowledge and not opinion and belief in the public’s perception of reality was aptly addressed by Pastor Ray Mummert: “We’ve been attacked by the intelligent, uneducated segment of our culture.”2.

Given that he thought he was attacking intellectualism, he likely did not think his message through.

The really surprising thing about Intelligent Design (ID) theorists is that they miss the larger point about explanation, which is that to explain something by invoking something itself unexplained is to provide no explanation at all 6.

American media is replete with such campaigns to malign intelligence and expertise, but we cannot lay the blame entirely on religion for the persistence of anti-intellectualism in America. The political system has contributed more than its share of efforts to dumb down the populace.

 

JUNK SCIENCE

Trofim Denisovich Lysenko was a Soviet agronomist who developed a pseudo-science based on Lamarckism, defined bybritannica.com as “a theory of evolution based on the principle that physical changes in organisms during their lifetime…could be transmitted to their offspring.” The term has come to signify the suppression of or refusal to acknowledge, science for ideological reasons,7 such as that of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his fellow conspiracy theorists.

A recent study is reportedly held up by Kennedy and conspiracy theory mongers as revealing a link between vaccines and autism. That study, The study “Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid” does not show a relationship between vaccines and autism, regardless of Mr. Kennedy’s claims to the contrary. The study has a long list of flaws as documented by the American Council on Science and Health8, and the publisher of the study, itself, faces criticism across the world wide web as a fake science blog, and not a scientific journal—although, in fairness, there exists a number of sites praising the publisher, the "Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law."9.

A few micro-incidents that sought to stupefy the American public:

·         George W. Bushe’s favorite climate “expert,” novelist Michael Crichton. Left a legacy for the delight of conspiracy theorists on the level of RFK’s vaccine disinformation drive.10 His climate change denial still resonates with the “alternate facts” set, twenty-two years later.

·         America’s disconnect with reality was on full view when an untold number believed that the Democratic Party ran a child-trafficking ring out of a pizza restaurant in Washington, D.C. Such is the state of the nation’s critical thinking capabilities. Elon Musk widened the gap between reality and the gullible set when he revived the story in late 2023,11 proving once again that the wealthy are not smarter than you; only luckier.

·         The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines "factoid" as "1: an invented fact believed to be true because it appears in print. 2: a briefly stated and usually trivial fact. Here, that definition is expanded to, a fact stripped of all nuance and context. Factoids are not usually used in the media, but they are effective in use among friends, relatives, and associates. In this sense, factoids are intended to produce specific inferences. Someone might tell you, in reference to undocumented immigrants sent to New York City, “The government gives illegal immigrants in New York City free luxury hotel rooms and credit cards. Credit cards!”

You are supposed to imagine hundreds of immigrants bound for El Salvador living in the Waldorf Astoria while shopping with their government-issued Platinum American Express cards. But you know that New York City has contracts with area hotels to hold several rooms for official visitors. It cost less to house immigrants there than to lease rooms anew. And those credit cards? Limited to use for food and baby supplies only. Your conspiracy-minded uncle neglected to divulge that part as it didn’t serve his narrative. That, or he was merely disinformed.

In that event, he was in large company.

##

 

Bibliography

1. Susan Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason (Pantheon Books, 2008) 18

1a. Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason, 22-23

1b. Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason, 25

2. Charles P. Pierce, Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free (Anchor Books, 2010)

3. Christine Leigh Heyrman, Department of History, University of Delaware, “The First Great Awakening,” ©National Humanities Center, Accessed April 22, 2025, https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/grawaken.htm

4. Susan Searls Giroux , “Between Race and Reason: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life,” Stanford University Press, September 16, 2011, https://truthout.org/articles/between-race-and-reason-antiintellectualism-in-american-life/

5. “Public’s Views on Human Evolution,” Pew Research Center, December 30, 2013, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/

5a. “Public Divided on Origins of Life: Religion A Strength and Weakness for Both Parties,” Pew Research Center, August 30, 2005, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/08/30/public-divided-on-origins-of-life/

6. A.C. Grayling, The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism (Bloomsbury, 2014) 111

7. Chris Mooney, The Republican War on Science (Basic Books, 2005) p.12

8. Junk Science, Bought and Paid For: The Latest Anti-Vaccine ‘Study’ is a Political Stunt, By Andrea Love, Ph.D. and Katie Suleta — Feb 07, 2025, https://www.acsh.org/news/2025/02/07/junk-science-bought-and-paid-latest-anti-vaccine-study-political-stunt-49291

9. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law – Bias and Credibility, "Overall, we rate Science, Public Health Policy & the Law as a pseudoscience source based on the frequent publication of vaccine misinformation to promote vaccine hesitancy. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to false claims and inappropriate claims of being peer-reviewed." https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/science-public-health-policy-the-law-bias-and-credibility/

10. Michael Crichton, author of State of Fear, leaves global warming disinformation legacy, https://whistleblower.org/politicization-of-climate-science/global-warming-denial-machine/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/

11. Philip Marcelo, “Elon Musk and others spread meme reviving unfounded ‘pizzagate’ conspiracy theory,” November 29, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-pizzagate-conspiracy-elon-musk-abc-657657139374

##

Friday, November 29, 2024

Jesus in a Medical Cart

 

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c9/Christus_Ravenna_Mosaic.jpg

US work that is in the public domain in the US for an unspecified reason, but presumably because it was published in the US before 1929.

 

Upon entering the previously unknown world of cancer diagnosis and prognosis, I saw a religious plea brochure on a countertop in the oncologist’s waiting room. Oh, no, I thought, I’m going to be deluged with sappy Christian propaganda. The descent into illness and death is not just fertile ground for Christian evangelists and other proselytizers: It is justification for their existence. Remember “No atheists in foxholes” mantra? It was a favorite for years, until enough people came forward with the invention of the internet, people who had faced death and did not convert to their religion and its and any one of its associated ideologies.

To my surprise, Christians did not spring en masse from woodwork and sewers to inform me of the suffering that awaits me if I do not convert to their particular brand of their particular religion, or of the rewards that await if I just pay them lip service. That’s all. Just lip service. Pretend Christianity. Instead of swarming around cancer patients I saw only the brochure and an infusion cart with a sticker that proclaimed the cart’s technician’s something something Jesus something something. My chemo and iron infusions were performed by a kindly lady who worked out of the cart and arranged it so the Jesus sticker faced me. She was such a sweetheart that I forgave her for her superstitious delusion. Her gentle and friendly manner were far from the violent, threatening posturing of my previous experience with Christians. I can only hope she is setting a trend.

If that is her goal, it is not working, or so I thought. I relied on the news of a decline in religiosity among Americans, but a tour of social media and news reports of a surge in Christian fundamentalism reveals that the religion of misogyny and xenophobia is not done with us yet. Americans working to produce a bright future are locked in a battle against forces that seek to return them to a medieval theocracy. The state of the future is the battleground.

Unless you’re dying of cancer; then you have only the present world that dreams of freedom from the kind of religion and of the kind of government Christianity (and Islam) seek to force on us.

 

More information:

https://bigthink.com/the-present/a-surprising-explanation-for-the-global-decline-of-religion/

##

Saturday, August 3, 2024

Ernie the Magic Elf

 


The rise in the number of religious “Nones” and its opposite—the decline in the number of people professing Christianity as their religion—has resulted in an angry backlash from a vocal minority: the Christo fascists. That angry minority includes celebrities, influencers, and power brokers like Clarence Thomas, Jordan Peterson, and huckster cum Bible salesman Donald Trump.

The Christo fascist intends to force his version of a god on the skeptic, the unbeliever, and the secular humanist. It is of paramount importance to the theist that an entire population appear to follow the dictates of his ideology and that they be forbidden from the appearance of straying from the faith. Witness the Muslim world, where any deviation from the norm can result in deadly consequences. That world is a template for the society dreamed of by the Christian evangelical right. My God is the one true God, they tell us. And you must accept my God or have him crammed up your… er, down your throat.

There is an obvious problem with that assertion, or any claim of supernatural entities, be they gods, unicorns, elves, vampires, etc., etc.: The problem: we can safely stake the claim that gods and other mythological and supernatural beings do not exist.

There is no God. One can say that with the same confidence that I might say there is no Ernie the Magic Elf. Both claims express absolutes and the absolute, like Ernie, does not exist. Of course, we might at any time, we might find a Magic Elf hiding in someone’s garden, just as, at any time, one of the thousands of gods posited by humans might step forward to cut out the middleman and make himself/herself/itself known to the world. God might decide that he/she/it can no longer depend on imperfect humans to deliver a perfect message (assuming he/she/it has a message to share), and who could dispute the need for his/her/its change in his/her/its method of dealing with people. After all, the roughly six-millennia method of his/her/its reliance on fallible and often malevolent humans to deliver his/her/its message has left us with wars, crusades, hucksters, priests, religious doctrine, and Kent Hovind.

To believe, or even opine, that a magic being exists to watch my every act and thought with the intention of punishment or reward fills me with a sense of incredulity. The idea is ludicrous. But, that is an argument from incredulity and the argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy, no different than arguing from emotion. Arguing a point based on one’s emotional attachment and emotional repulsion to it is to concede the point.

When Ernie the Magic Elf is revealed, my a-elfism will undergo a significant reappraisal. When a god reveals himself/herself/itself to the world, my atheism will have received its death blow.  At that time, I will believe.


Saturday, November 25, 2023

Illiteracy in the Marble Halls

 


Photo by Spencer Davis on Unsplash

“In every age it has been the tyrant, the oppressor and the exploiter who has wrapped himself in the cloak of patriotism, or religion, or both to deceive and overawe the People.” ― Eugene Victor Debs

 

In defiance of the U.S. Constitution, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Rep. Lauren Boebert, presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, Pennsylvania gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano[1], and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas have declared their support for a state religion based on Christian nationalist and Christian dominion dogma[2].

The First Amendment to the Constitution: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Read that first part again. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….”

Lauren Boebert, among others of the far-right authoritarian political spectrum didn’t read that part. I can only wonder if they have read the rest of the Constitution.

In a Sunday, June 28th, 2023, speech at the Cornerstone Christian Center in Basalt, Colo., Lauren Boebert argued, “The church is supposed to direct the government. The government is not supposed to direct the church,” Boebert told the crowd, which applauded. “I’m tired of this separation of church and state junk.”

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia hard-liner, adding her support to the idea of a Christian Nationalist government declared: “We need to be the party of nationalism and I’m a Christian, and I say it proudly, we should be Christian Nationalists.”

Reflecting the views of Boebert’s and Green’s soulmate Michele Bachmann who once said, “If you want take away my religious liberties,” she once said in a radio interview with Lars Larson, “you can advocate for that but you do it through the constitutional process and you don’t intimidate and no politician should give away my religious liberties or yours.” Somehow, in that muddled brain, she equated the call for gay rights as a move to take away her religious rights, and then assures us that her religious rights are ensconced in the Constitution; that human rights are a violation of her interpretation of the Constitution. Can she perceive why the term “batshittery” was invented to describe her incoherent ramblings?

The more conservative elements within the Christian religion have translated Bible verses in any manner that they feel promotes their views. It doesn’t matter what the scripture in question says, it only matters how it can be twisted, spun, bent, and mangled. That same thinking drives those Christians into reinterpreting the Constitution, our history, the words of the Founders, and the pronouncements of political figures. Anything can mean anything to the semi-literate.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz, Matt Gaetz, among a legion of others — thrive on fear and hate, the two-sided coin that drives the reactionary right.

A wise man once told me, “Do not ever- ever — make a crucial decision when you are in the throes of fear or hate. Nothing good can come of it. Wait until your senses return, and then decide.”

It’s unfortunate for our country that many of our politicians have not had a wise man or woman in their lives.

#

[1] Mastriano came to national prominence by leading protests against COVID protocols, and became one of the leading voices in attempting to overturn the 2020 presidential election. He literally brought bus-loads of supporters to the Jan. 6 insurrection and appeared to cross police barricades during the riot. He has spread Islamophobic conspiracy theories and tweeted out QAnon content. He pals around with white militias and prays to God to protect Confederate monuments. He once said women who have abortions should be charged with murder.
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/10/doug-mastriano-christian-nationalism-dominionism-nar.html


# 

Friday, July 28, 2023

The Great American Dumb-Down

 



“For what a man had rather were true, he more readily believes.” — Francis Bacon

“Because it takes nothing on faith, science is inherently antiauthoritarian, and a great equalizer of political power. That is why it is under attack.” -Shawn Otto, The War on Science, p. 41, Minneapolis (2016 )

So-called “pro-lifers” view the “ball of about one hundred fifty cells constituting a five-day-old embryo as deserving of the same moral and legal protections as fully developed human beings.” Chris Mooney, The Republican War on Science, New York (2005), p.2

The Florida Board of Education Chair said in 2019 that he “won’t support any evolution being taught as fact at all in any of our schools.” https://churchandstate.org.uk/2019/08/new-florida-board-of-education-chair-i-wont-support-any-evolution-being-taught-as-fact-at-all-in-any-of-our-schools/

The March 2014 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores decision by the Supreme Court ruled that three kinds of pills are abortifacients that are not, in fact, abortifacients. The scientific definition of pregnancy that was adopted by the federal government states that pregnancy occurs when a fertilized egg is implanted in the uterine wall. Religions define pregnancy as occurring when an egg is fertilized. Many eggs are flushed naturally. Is nature (or “God”) performing abortions? The court sided with Hobby Lobby even though the ruling was contraindicated by federal regulations and the scientific definition. — Shawn Otto, The War on Science, Minneapolis (2016)

More than a third of Florida’s New College teachers will not return for the 2023 Fall semester due to the governor’s “Dumb-Down” policies affecting the school. https://www.tampabay.com/news/education/2023/07/18/new-college-florida-ridiculously-high-number-faculty-are-gone/

“15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense”
“Opponents of evolution want to make a place for creationism by tearing down real science, but their arguments don’t hold up.
By John Rennie on July 1, 2002
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/

That is a tiny sample of a large list of stories about the anti-intellectualist movement in the United States about efforts to restrict knowledge in the American population. As the U.S. continues to embrace policies that refute science, reason, and logical analysis, we can expect another nation or other nations to pick up the slack. In that event, America will become just another second- or third-world country fighting for survival in a world that finds it irrelevant.

My interest in the dumbing down of my country began sometime prior to 1957 when I was a pre-teen. In that year the Red Scare created in large part by Senator Joseph McCarthy and the House Unamerican Activities Committee fizzled to an end. but long before that, the curiosity of a child led me to a pursuit of knowledge not based on magic, superstition, or opinion. I wanted to know.

#

A man in a red suit stood on a roof, Standing next to the chimney and waving to the crowd of holiday spectators below. My parents had driven my brother and me across town to see the Christmas lights and Santa and his magic reindeer. Santa didn’t go down the chimney, he only waved and ho-ho-hoed at the crowd below. It was the reindeer that held my attention, though. They didn’t move. And they glowed by a light within. I realized that the deer were plastic, and that Santa was never going to go down the chimney because he was too big and his red suit was too clean. It’s all fake, I told myself.

I continued to feign belief in Santa for the goodies it got me on Christmas morning, but I had become convinced that Santa was a story made up by adults to entertain kids. Disbelief in Santa soon led to skepticism about elves and fairies and unicorns. By the time I entered high school, I was aware that magic men did not walk on water, donkeys didn’t talk, kangaroos didn’t migrate from Australia to Israel to hop a boat, and stories of zombies and walking dead were…well, stories. Those tales led to a love of literature and reading the Bible resulted in a love of poetry. But even a child can be skeptical of extravagant claims, even those made in so-called “holy” books.

An adult told me that God punishes non-believers by torturing them an eternity. An authority figure who I respected attempted to indoctrinate me into religion with some Christian dogma so obviously fallacious that even a post-toddler saw through it. Then, a third-grade teacher refuted the school’s science book by telling the class that condensation and evaporation did not exist; God made the rain, she said. Later, a senior warrant officer demanded that I formally deny my atheism or receive a court-martial and a dishonorable discharge. I believed him. I learned later that his threat was illegal. I had grounds for a lawsuit against the US Navy.

A thread of anti-intelligence weaved through those experiences, and others. Each demanded that I suspend reason and accept their demands for belief or face certain punishment. Each demanded that I suspend intellect to accept the speaker’s version of reality on faith- that is, on opinion and indoctrination. The lessons I learned in my science books made sense; I could grasp the concepts and the reasoning behind the claims. I struggled to believe the stories about a magic man who lived in the sky, who created humans by speaking them into existence, and who would consign me to a burning pit of fire forever if I questioned that story. Now, in the age of a resurgence of 1930s-style of fascism, anti-intelligence legislation rolls out of Washington, D.C., and American state capitals with metronymic frequency.

The leap into the denial of the existence of supernatural beings was automatic. It lay in waiting from the moment that I realized those plastic reindeer weren’t real.

I turn first to the Wikipedia web site and its citations first when seeking definitions. The opening segment of the “Intellectualism” page reads: “Intellectualism is the mental perspective that emphasizes the use, the development, and the exercise of the intellect; and also identifies the life of the mind of the intellectual person. In the field of philosophy, the term intellectualism is synonymous with rationalism, knowledge derived from reason.

My concern is not with those “who scorn intellectuals, but those who hold in contempt formal education, critical thinking, and intelligence in favor of magical thinking. It is magical thinking above all in my experience that has pushed the United States down to such levels of anti-intellect that our leaders (and I use the term loosely) are too often represented by the likes of James Inhofe, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Louie Gohmert, and Antonin Scalia, where they could use their fundamentalist (and therefore, unthinking) religion to force American laws into line with their unscientific, irrational and uninformed opinions. We are told we must teach children a creationist view of science disguised as “Intelligent Design,” and that our religion requires us to enact laws that dictate the control the bodily autonomy of women. Christianity forces itself on Americans with totalitarian authority in its passage and enforcement of anti-abortion laws by citing the Bible as a source of the “abortion is murder” meme. That, of course, raises the question: why do we give a flying frog what the Bible says?

Religion IS anti-intellectualism. But we all hold beliefs and opinions that run counter to the rules of reason and logic. So, is the belief in a supreme being so bad?

Well, yes, it is when you work to force those beliefs and opinions on others through the power of legislation and the courts. The separation of church and state does more to keep society sane and in search of truth than any magic man in the clouds could do.

Fundamentalist religion is not alone in its drive to dumb down Americans. The current batch of legislation from around the country reveals a white supremacy strain in the teaching of American history. Educators are told that they cannot teach the role of blacks in America’s past through the contents of Critical Race Theory and books like Nikole Hannah-Jones’ The 1619 Project. The anti-intelligence faction believes (that is, of the opinion) that truth is what consensus believes. Are so concerned with the feelings of a few delicate sensibilities that we will deny our own history?

We can only engage in the uncharitable and un-Christian hope that the rest of the world is engaged in the same Dumbing Down process as America has embraced. Otherwise, we might well see third world nations outpace us in scientific advances. Is that the fate the holders of power in Washington wish for us? It certainly seems so, doesn’t it?

#

Suggested Reading:

Forrest, Barbara & Gross, Paul R. Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford, 2004.

Freeman, Charles. The Closing of the Western Mind: The Rise of Faith and the Fall of Reason. Alfred A. Knopf, 2002.

Hofstadter, Richard. Intellectualism in American Life. Vintage, 1963.

Jacoby, Susan. Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism. Metropolitan, 2004.

Jacoby, Susan. The Age of American Unreason. Pantheon, 2008.

Levitin, Daniel J. Weaponized Lies: How to Think Critically in the Post-Truth Era. Dutton, 2017

Mooney, Chris & Kirshenbaum, Sheril. Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future. Basic, 2009.

Otto, Shawn. The War on Science: Who’s Waging it and Why it Matters. Milkweed Productions, 2016.

Specter, Michael. Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives. Penguin, 2009.

#

Saturday, June 24, 2023

God's Graffiti

 

Photo by author

I’ve almost finished reading Revolutionary Characters, by historian Gordon S. Wood, and have recently read biographies on George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. I intend to squeeze in Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton as soon as I can acquire the books, and I’ll look up the others on the internet. I look especially for information on their religious views and, so far, I have found nothing to indicate that the founding fathers were the devout men that Christian apologists and evangelicals would have us believe. Most of the Founders were deists, the prevailing sentiment held by the educated upper classes of the time, and they held in varying degrees of indifference and contempt the evangelical Christianity of the masses.

The religious right in this modern age like to point to references to God in the founders’ letters and documents as proof of the religiosity of the framers of the Constitution, but the God of the deists bore no resemblance to the angry meddling God whose words contemporary evangelist would have inscribed on every surface of every federal facility on the planet and taught as science in the classrooms of our public schools. Appeals to God in those letters and documents were appeals to Providence, not to some denominational creator who heaps beneficence on the faithful and severe judgment on those not obedient to His authority as expressed by one or another interpretive branch of His dictates.

George Washington, ever aware of his public image, attended church to display his affinity with his constituency in much the same way modern politicians, steeped in corruption and self-interest, cater to a religious constituency to appear as one of the people. Alexander Hamilton used Christianity to achieve political ends and did not express adherence to the faith until the early nineteenth century, decades after his prominence in Revolutionary politics. John Adams openly expressed in belief in deism but thought church attendance essential to man’s morality. Thomas Paine’s masterpiece, The Age of Reason, promoted deism and criticized Christian doctrine. Benjamin Franklin considered himself a deeply religious man, but in his writings, he often refers to “the deity” and “providence,” without mention of Christianity. He endeavored to virtue, but of course, virtue does not rely on religion for its practice or existence. James Madison rigorously defended and promoted religious freedom. Of the founding fathers, only John Jay and Patrick Henry attested to orthodox Christianity. They did not belong to the class of educated men who adhered to the prevailing theology of deism among the landed elite in the northern colonies. Evangelical Christianity was, to those who aspired to a republican aristocracy in the Age of Enlightenment, the religion of the unenlightened masses.

The furor over the place of religion in patriotism began with Francis Scott Key’s words in the Star-Spangled Banner: “And this be our motto: In God is our trust.” We can assume without further research that the god referred to is the Judeo-Christian deity.

Proselytizers and enforcers of religious have only the motto “In God We Trust” as a wedge and as justification for their attempts to force fundamentalist Christianity on an entire nation, but that graffiti did not appear on American currency until the Civil War's religious revival period, at a time of religious revival in the United States and was not adopted as the national motto until the Eisenhower administration in 1956, when the aristocratic values inherent in the Age of Enlightenment ceased to have relevance. Its acceptance as the national motto was accelerated when positioned as a response to “Godless Communism”.

The most militant atheist quarrels with inscriptions of the national motto on currency and the Ten Commandments on the face of federal buildings, but most Americans view those allusions to religion with ambivalence. The motto refers only to “God” and does not promote the god of a favored group, and the Decalogue represents a historical event and is not the sole province of any particular philosophy. The exact wording belongs to the Judeo-Muslim-Christian heritage, but identical admonitions come from multiple cultures and religions ranging from the code of Hammurabi to definitions of proper behavior in Scientology. It does not require religious thought to know that rules set forward in the Commandments represent common-sense applications for an individual to live by if he is to live at peace in a society. The problem many deists have with religious graffiti on taxpayer-funded property lies in the rigid enforcement by brown-shirt religious leaders to limit those inscriptions to their particular faith. Why not include Buddhism’s Eightfold Path, and the Sutras of Patanjali? Buddhism and Hinduism, are, after all, well represented in American society, as are Wicca, Paganism, Scientology, and any number of groups and doctrines that have sprung up to challenge the rigid and chauvinist dogma of Christianity and its history of torture, mass murder, and denial of reason and free thought to enforce its adherence.






#



Thursday, March 23, 2023

The New, Improved Jesus

 

Italienne missionnaire manchot, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons


The Supreme court has declined to hear a Florida case that would have made it harder to sue over government violation of the First Amendment. We will have to wait for another day to force our medieval religious opinions on a public that is moving away from that mindset.

But wait. Clarence "Uncle" Thomas and his quest to theocratize government is not through yet. The authoritarian right will find other, similar cases to force us into the loving arms of televangelist hucksters...er, I mean men of God. Praise Jesus!


The Church of England has declared its intention to refuse to allow marriage rites to same-sex couples. Take away our God-given right to hate gays and who is left for us Christians to deny Christ's love? Well yes, there are women, atheists, liberals, and intellectuals, but except for atheists, he can't hate as hard on them as we can on the LGBTQ people and we must vent our pent-up rage at our growing irrelevance somehow, mustn't we?

Across the ocean, an agent of the American federal government has ruled that higher education institution are withing their rights to discriminate against homosexuals. Our need to keep a large segment of the population in the closet and out of higher education has advanced, thanks to a federal jusdge and a freedom-loving group with a record of defending reliously-affiliated universities we are one step closer to pushing these "Others" back into the closet.

Jesus loves you, some of you.


Tuesday, November 29, 2022

Elohim and the Well-Regulated Militia

 


Frank, my Gun Toting, Bible Thumping, Trump voting, flag waving, libtard hating, gay bashing, camo cosplaying acquaintance tells me (and anyone else within earshot) that he has proof of (1.) a god's existence (he doesn't elaborate on which one), and (2.) proof that the 2022 mid-term elections were rigged. When I asked which god? He responded:

"Duh, the only one, Dumbass."

"So, The Invisible Pink Unicorn."

That sent him into a rage, a rage that didn't answer my question. A series of Bible verses written by stone-age poets convinced me that he meant the god of the Bible.

"Oh," I said. "You mean Elohim."

"No, Dumbass, I mean Jehovah, the One True God."

I stand corrected.

"Have you discussed your proof with any scientists, or universities, or peer-reviewed journals?"

A rhetorical question. I already knew the answer.

His "proof" was a document that makes the claim--The Bible. That's like using the Quran to "prove" the existence of Allah, or Bullfinch's Mythology to "prove" the existence of Zeus.

Frank wasn't buying it, though. Every word in the Bible is true, he says.

"Even the parts that contradict each other?" I asked.

There are no contradictions, he says. You have to know how to read the text to understand it.

"So, God inspired the writers of the book to encode it so that only a select few know the secret to translating it.

At that point Frank refused to talk to me any further on the subject, leaving me confused. We didn’t even get to the part about the so-called thrown election. Ah, but rest assured, Frank will have something to say about that soon. He is, you see, a member of that demographic who identifies with his hate--a demographic that brings to the rational observer both amusement and concern. And hate, like pain, is a condition that demands expression.

##

Friday, January 21, 2022

Fear and Loathing Among the Semi-Literate

 

Photo by Anthony Garand on Unsplash

“In every age it has been the tyrant, the oppressor and the exploiter who has wrapped himself in the cloak of patriotism, or religion, or both to deceive and overawe the People.” ― Eugene Victor Debs


The First Amendment to the Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Read that first part again. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...."

Michelle Bachmann didn't read that part. It's the First Amendment. I can only wonder if she has read the rest of them. 

“If you want take away my religious liberties,” she once said in a radio interview with Lars Larson, “you can advocate for that but you do it through the constitutional process and you don’t intimidate and no politician should give away my religious liberties or yours.”

Somehow, in that muddled brain, she equates the call for gay rights as a move to take away her religious rights, and then assures us that her religious rights are esconced in the Constirution; that human rights are a violation of her interpretation of the Constitution. Can she perceive why the term "batshittery" was invented to describe her incoherent ramblings?

Some of the more conservative elements within the Christian religion have translated Bible verses in any manner that they feel promotes their views. It doesn't matter what the scripture in question actually says, it only matters how it can be twisted, spun, bent, and mangled. That same thinking drives those Christians into reworking the Constitution, our history, the words of the Founders, and the pronouncements of political figures. Anything can mean anything to semi-literate, and it does. 

Michelle Bachmann and her current cronies-in-kind-- Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ted Cruz, Matt Gaetz, among a legion of others-- thrive on fear and hate, the two-sided coin that drives the reactionary right.

A wise man once told me, "Do not ever-- ever-- make a crucial decision when you are in the throes of fear or hate. Nothing good can come of it. Wait until your senses return, and then decide."

It's unfortunate for our country that many of our right-wing politicians have not had a wise man or woman in their lives.
##

Saturday, January 8, 2022

For Want of a Theme

 


This blog has suffered through abandonment and fresh starts, indecision and neglect, and the lack of a theme. It is that need of a unifying theme that has had me stop and start so often. I began with politics, but soon saw that meant dealing with idiots, so I changed to religion and philosophy. That won’t work as a theme either. There is only so much I can say about the incredulity of religious claims.

I considered a “How to Clean” theme but, though a clean freak, I am no expert on the subject.

Architecture. That would be great. I do love the fields of art and architecture, but there is a problem: the cost of graphics. I cannot at this time afford the cost of images of those works on the internet.

So, I’ve chosen to blog with no theme. I have a wide variety of interests on which I think I have something to say. With no unifying theme, I can write about cleaning hacks, post-modern architecture, the current political climate and its threat to the democratic experiment, the military, books and literature, my own short stories and essays, and even the adventures of an amateur cook. The field is wide open.

In the coming days I will post a short story centered on illicit sex, another, a historical fiction featuring the Joseph McCarthy political with hunts of the 1950s, and a bio and review of one of my literary heroes.

I hope that the freedom to write a themeless blog will be as entertaining and informative as it is liberating.

##


Saturday, January 1, 2022

God's Graffiti


Photo by Alonzo Skelton

All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach. --Adolf Hitler

   #

A disclaimer: Readers who have some psychological need to convert others to belief systems involving supernatural characters will be offended by some of the contents of this essay.

 I’m almost finished reading Revolutionary Characters, by historian Gordon S. Wood, and have recently read biographies on George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. I intend to squeeze in Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Alexander Hamilton as soon as I can acquire the books, and I’ll look up the others on the internet. I look especially for information on their religious views. So far, I have found nothing to indicate that the founding fathers were religious men. They were deists, the prevailing sentiment held by the educated upper classes of the time, and they held in varying degrees of indifference and contempt the evangelical Christianity of the masses.

 The religious right in this modern age like to point to references to God in the founders’ letters and documents as proof of the religiosity of the framers of the Constitution, but the God of the deists bore no resemblance to the angry meddling God whose words contemporary evangelist would have inscribed on every surface of every federal facility on the planet and taught as science in the classrooms of our public schools. Appeals to God in those letters and documents were appeals to Providence, not to some denominational creator who heaps beneficence on the faithful and severe judgment on those not obedient to His authority as expressed by one or another interpretive branch of His dictates.

George Washington, ever aware of his public image, attended church to display his affinity with his constituency in much the same way modern politicians, steeped in corruption and self-interest, cater to a religious constituency to appear as one of the people. Alexander Hamilton used Christianity to achieve political ends, and did not express any adherence to the faith until the early nineteenth century, decades after his prominence in Revolutionary politics. John Adams openly expressed in belief in deism, but thought church attendance essential to man’s morality. Thomas Paine’s masterpiece, The Age of Reason, promoted deism and criticized Christian doctrine. Benjamin Franklin considered himself a deeply religious man, but in his writings he often refers to “the deity” and “providence,” without mention of Christianity. He endeavored to virtue, but of course, virtue does not rely on religion for its practice or existence. James Madison rigorously defended and promoted religious freedom. Of the founding fathers, only John Jay and Patrick Henry attested to orthodox Christianity. They did not belong to the class of educated men who adhered to the prevailing theology of deism among the landed elite in the northern colonies. Evangelical Christianity was, to those who aspired to a republican aristocracy in the Age of Enlightenment, the religion of the unenlightened masses.

 Proselytizers and enforcers of religious have only the motto “In God We Trust” as a wedge and as justification for their attempts to force fundamentalist Christianity on an entire nation, but that motto did not appear on American currency until nearly a century after the signing of the Constitution, at a time of religious revival in the United States and was not adopted as the national motto until the Eisenhower administration in 1956, when the aristocratic values inherent in the Age of Enlightenment ceased to have relevance.

The most militant atheist quarrels with inscriptions of the national motto on currency and the Ten Commandments on the face of federal buildings, but most Americans view those allusions to religion with ambivalence. The motto refers only to “God” and does not promote the god of a favored group, and the Decalogue represents a historical event and is not the sole province of any particular philosophy. The exact wording belongs to the Judeo-Muslim-Christian heritage, but identical admonitions come from multiple cultures and religions ranging from the code of Hammurabi to definitions of proper behavior in Scientology. It does not require religious thought to know that rules set forward in the Commandments represent common-sense applications for an individual to live by if he is to live at peace in a society. The problem many deists have with religious graffiti on taxpayer-funded property lies in the rigid enforcement by brown-shirt religious leaders to limit those inscriptions to their particular faith. Why not include Buddhism’s Eightfold Path, and the Sutras of Patanjali? Buddhism and Hinduism, are, after all, well represented in American society, as are Wicca, Paganism, Scientology, and any number of groups and doctrines that have sprung up to challenge the rigid and chauvinist dogma of Christianity and its history of torture, mass murder, and denial of reason and free thought to enforce its adherence.

If I sound critical of militant religiosity, it is only because the Flying Spaghetti Monster (www.venganza.org/) has not received equal billing with Christian thought.


Saturday, September 4, 2021

The Texas Taliban, Chapter One


I live in a country where people try to make the abortion rate go down by making it harder for women to get birth control. --John Fugelsang

 I'm seeing online comments about the US withdrawal from Afghanistan as a defeat for American power and an indicator of the decline of the West. American Women feel that defeat and decline all the way to Texas where an American Taliban, based on a faulty reading of Christian scripture, And an extremist ideology in power in the legislature, passed a law that makes illegal the termination of unwanted pregnancies. Combining fascism with Stalinism, The American Republican Party has extended a bonus to the batshit crazy element of American society by promising fortunes to any who inform on those who aid and abet in an abortion or discuss the planning of an abortion or offer assistance such as a ride to an abortion facility, or. . ., well, you get the idea. Christians, Muslims, conservatives, and control freaks everywhere, Rejoice! Our fear of feminine sexuality has won the day. Now, if we can just do something about uppity women in superior positions in employment we can truly say that, at last, culture based on religious extremism is within our grasp. Institutionalized misogyny is within our grasp. Praise Jesus!


Saturday, October 10, 2020

A Rude Awakening

 

Photo by Dylan from Pexels


A friend recently made a snarky comment to me regarding my atheism. I called her on the remark: I asked her why she would say such a thing.

As an atheist, I am used to sarcasm and contempt from members of the various Christian sects-- that religion, along with its sister, Islam-- are most demanding that its followers work to convert others not of their faith, and unofficially to treat them with ill-disguised loathing if they refuse to convert. Seeing that loathing come from a friend was a wake-up call. I came to see that the hate for the unbeliever is a feature of Christianity; that even friends and family members are not immune to it.

I did not face indoctrination into religion at an early age. When the subject finally did enter my life at aged twelve years, I faced a world of people who came of age steeped in a belief in what appeared to me as the power of wishful thinking; in an invisible person who would come to their aid in times of trouble; and that some undefined element called a “soul” would arise from the body to represent the believer in an infinite utopian existence following his or her death. Reading those responses to my newfound knowledge might give a slight insight into the confusion those followers of faith aroused in me at that tender age. How could otherwise reasonable adults believe such nonsense, I thought. The awareness that they did, in fact, believe those things to be true was a rude awakening.

Even before my introduction into religious thought, I bowed my head as instructed for the school prayer that started each day, just before a geography class taught by a devout teacher who denied the science of meteorology. She taught us that rain was not caused by condensation and air temperature but came as a gift from God. Even at ten years, I knew she was spouting bullshit, though “bullshit” was not in my vocabulary at that time. I knew instinctively of its prevalence in matters of belief.

I hid my thoughts about religion from others, even pretending to agree with it to avoid strife. Then, sometime after my thirtieth birthday, I came across three books that forever changed my own world view by introducing me to philosophy: Richard Hittleman’s introduction to Hatha and Raja Yoga, Robert Pirsig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, and the works of Alan Watts. Those tomes led me to the entire panoply of philosophical writing, careening through the Greeks to the Enlightenment, the Existentialists, and currently—Alain de Botton. Now, as a novice student of philosophy, I have become more tolerant of religion. I work to understand belief: its causes and effects and the reasoning behind it.

If only believers would extend that same tolerance. 

 

Saturday, October 3, 2020

Some Horses are Like Camels

 

Photo by Ric Rodrigues from Pexels


Frank, a gun-toting, Bible thumping, Trump-voting, Jesus humping, flag-waving, libtard-hating friend of a friend says a woman’s right to choose whether to carry a fetus to term is against the will of his god.

“Which god is that?” I asked.

“What do you mean, ‘which god.’ The true god of the Bible,” he said.

“But doesn’t the Bible condone abortion?”

“What? Hell no! The Bible doesn’t say it’s ok to kill babies.”

But,” I said, “doesn’t Numbers 5:11-31 offer a formula for a woman to terminate an unwanted pregnancy? And doesn’t Exodus 21:22-25 make abortion a crime against property and not against a person?”

His jaw dropped and he looked at me lie I had grown horns and a barbed tail. “You’re taking it out of context,” he snarled.

“Go check it out. The verses are unambiguous.”

I did not hear back from him, but two weeks later I heard from a friend that he had posted an anti-choice screed on his Facebook post. I remembered a frequently-spoken comment from my father: “You can lead a horse to water but you can’t make him drink.”

 

Numbers 5:11-31 KJV

11  And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 12  Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them, If any man's wife go aside, and commit a trespass against him, 13  And a man lie with her carnally, and it be hid from the eyes of her husband, and be kept close, and she be defiled, and there be no witness against her, neither she be taken with the manner; 14  And the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be defiled: or if the spirit of jealousy come upon him, and he be jealous of his wife, and she be not defiled: 15  Then shall the man bring his wife unto the priest, and he shall bring her offering for her, the tenth part of an ephah of barley meal; he shall pour no oil upon it, nor put frankincense thereon; for it is an offering of jealousy, an offering of memorial, bringing iniquity to remembrance. 16  And the priest shall bring her near, and set her before the Lord: 17  And the priest shall take holy water in an earthen vessel; and of the dust that is in the floor of the tabernacle the priest shall take, and put it into the water: 18  And the priest shall set the woman before the Lord, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which is the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse: 19  And the priest shall charge her by an oath, and say unto the woman, If no man have lain with thee, and if thou hast not gone aside to uncleanness with another instead of thy husband, be thou free from this bitter water that causeth the curse: 20  But if thou hast gone aside to another instead of thy husband, and if thou be defiled, and some man have lain with thee beside thine husband: 21  Then the priest shall charge the woman with an oath of cursing, and the priest shall say unto the woman, The Lord make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the Lord doth make thy thigh to rot, [1] and thy belly to swell; 22  And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. 23  And the priest shall write these curses in a book, and he shall blot them out with the bitter water: 24  And he shall cause the woman to drink the bitter water that causeth the curse: and the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter. 25  Then the priest shall take the jealousy offering out of the woman's hand, and shall wave the offering before the Lord, and offer it upon the altar: 26  And the priest shall take an handful of the offering, even the memorial thereof, and burn it upon the altar, and afterward shall cause the woman to drink the water. 27 And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. 28  And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. 29  This is the law of jealousies, when a wife goeth aside to another instead of her husband, and is defiled; 30  Or when the spirit of jealousy cometh upon him, and he be jealous over his wife, and shall set the woman before the Lord, and the priest shall execute upon her all this law. 31  Then shall the man be guiltless from iniquity, and this woman shall bear her iniquity.

Exodus 21:22-25
22  If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. 23  And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, 24  Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25  Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.