Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Alternatives

 

Alternatives

“Grifter” Gemini AI-generated image

 

I thought Bernie Sanders was going to be The Man, the Destroyer of Worlds. He would upset the New World Order and bring Sanity back to the USA. This, I opined, was our Super Villian, the protagonist of the World Story who would save us all from ourselves.

That’s a lot of capitalization just to say Hillary was not that person and The Donald had told so many lies that I knew he was untrustworthy to follow through on his promises. So, when Trump won the election, I settled in for four more years of mundane Washington politics.

It took only two days after the inauguration for me to see the fallacy in my thinking.

The television was on for background noise, and I was only half listening when I heard the words, “alternative facts.” That got my attention. I am a collector of words and phrases that resonate with me; like “adorkable,” “cockwomble,” and “Backpfeifengesicht.” * I raced to my computer to record “alternative facts” as my new favorite.

On learning that the phrase came from the Trump White House, my transformation from Trump as cockwomble, and Backpfeifengesicht began to move to Trump, my savior, the man who would come as the Destroyer of World I had waited so long for.

Now, eight years later, the destruction has begun. I have become a MAGA, awaiting the final and long overdue collapse of the New World Order created by years of professional politicians thinking themselves entitled to office in the government of the world’s richest nation; entitled without regard to what the people wanted, only what their donors demanded, and wealthy parasites feeding off the poor.

Trump says he will change that, and I think I believe him, but there is that problem with the 35,000 lies and the alternative facts.

 

Backpfeifengesicht: German compound word for a 'face that should be slapped'

##

Wednesday, April 30, 2025

The Great American Dumb-Down

 

Photo By Roman Eisele - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=87283346

MISEDUCATION

There is a growing and disturbing trend of anti-intellectual elitism in American culture. It’s the dismissal of science, of the arts, and humanities and their replacement by entertainment, self-righteousness, ignorance, and deliberate gullibility. –Ray Williams, Wired for Success article July 07, 2014

The Texas Senate is pushing for the enforcement of its legislator’s preferred religion on the state’s children by requiring that the Christian scripture’s Ten Commandments be to be displayed in public schools. Senate Bill 10 passed on a 20-1 vote along party lines. Earlier. Senate Bill 11, allowing students to take time from the serious work of study to pray- a form of wishful thinking- to infringe on the three Rs. The bill ignored the fact that students are allowed to pray without the Senate’s input; they just cannot be guided or forced into the ritual by school staff. The dumb-down crowd pushing for a Taliban-like enforcement of their beliefs will not likely stop at mere displays and private time.

With the sweeping victory of Donald Trump into the White House and his party taking majorities in the nation’s senate and House of Representatives, such extreme politics have become the norm, not the exception. We can expect to see further bills from more conservative states introducing similar measures if the Texas effort succeeds and, being that it is Texas that those states will emulate, we can count on an authoritarian frenzy to sweep all but the most scientifically literate locales.

The United State has a long history of such attempts to dumb down the citizenry. Early in our history, Congress rejected George Washington’s proposal for a national university because it might offend the dominance of Christian universities in the nation’s educational system, 1 thus beginning America’s long flirtation with what journalist Charles P. Pierce called’’ “Idiot America.”2 The drive to force a bronze-age knowledge system onto the public, combined with the undercurrent of anti-intellectualism that rises to the surface with alarming frequency and driven with doctrinal Christianity’s obsessive need to force it’s dogmatic beliefs onto the world go back in U.S. history at least to the time of the First Great Awakening that captured the fledging nation between the 1730s and the 1770s. Christine Leigh Heyrman at the National Humanities Center writes: “Throughout the colonies, conservative and moderate clergymen questioned the emotionalism of evangelicals and charged that disorder and discord attended the revivals.”3 Now, some 275 years later, those conservatives embrace the very emotion over intellect they once rejected as a necessary component of political ideology. “Facts don’t care about your feelings,” someone once said, with feeling.

Look into any talk radio program, read any social media meme promoting far-right propaganda (and some from the left-- those devious libtards are waking up) and you will find appeals to emotion; Outrage, anger, revenge, hate… One might search for days without seeing a single message designed to stir the intellect.

“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'” ― Isaac Asimov

Thomas Jefferson “was the first distinguished victim of a decisively anti-intellectual attack, and the assault on him (leveled principally by Federalist leaders and members of the established clergy) set a precedent for subsequent efforts to render an active, curious mind either trivial and ridiculous or evil and dangerous...The capacity for reflective, creative, and critical thought, finely honed argumentation, and public persuasion—talents one might other­wise assume well recommend a candidate for the office of president—were transformed into the gravest of liabilities.”4

 

A highly influential, if not seminal, work by Richard Hofstadter, defined anti-intellectualism as: “a resentment and suspicion of the life of the mind and of those who are considered to represent it; and a disposition constantly to minimize the value of that life”.

By that definition, anti-intellectualism has reached a fever pitch in modern American life. Consider that…

  •     One-third of Americans believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible. “Nearly 6 in 10 believe that the bloody predictions of the Book of Revelations—which involve the massacre of everyone who does not accept Jesus as the Messiah—will come true.”1
  •     Two-thirds of Americans want creationism taught alongside of evolution in public schools.
  •     Forty-eight percent accept any form of evolution—even theistic evolution.
  •     Twenty-six percent accept Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.
  •     An astounding 42 percent believe all life has existed in their present form since the beginning of time.1a. 5.

Those numbers a scary, but they are not the whole story. Though it appears that Americans are prone to magical thinking based on a particular religion as expressed in a particular sacred text, yet “A majority of American adults…cannot name the four Gospels or identify Genesis as the first book of the Bible.1b

A 1998 study from the University of Texas found that one-fourth of public-school biology teachers believe that humans and dinosaurs inhabited the earth at the same time. Be afraid for our public-school students. Be very afraid.

The battle to keep knowledge and not opinion and belief in the public’s perception of reality was aptly addressed by Pastor Ray Mummert: “We’ve been attacked by the intelligent, uneducated segment of our culture.”2.

Given that he thought he was attacking intellectualism, he likely did not think his message through.

The really surprising thing about Intelligent Design (ID) theorists is that they miss the larger point about explanation, which is that to explain something by invoking something itself unexplained is to provide no explanation at all 6.

American media is replete with such campaigns to malign intelligence and expertise, but we cannot lay the blame entirely on religion for the persistence of anti-intellectualism in America. The political system has contributed more than its share of efforts to dumb down the populace.

 

JUNK SCIENCE

Trofim Denisovich Lysenko was a Soviet agronomist who developed a pseudo-science based on Lamarckism, defined bybritannica.com as “a theory of evolution based on the principle that physical changes in organisms during their lifetime…could be transmitted to their offspring.” The term has come to signify the suppression of or refusal to acknowledge, science for ideological reasons,7 such as that of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his fellow conspiracy theorists.

A recent study is reportedly held up by Kennedy and conspiracy theory mongers as revealing a link between vaccines and autism. That study, The study “Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid” does not show a relationship between vaccines and autism, regardless of Mr. Kennedy’s claims to the contrary. The study has a long list of flaws as documented by the American Council on Science and Health8, and the publisher of the study, itself, faces criticism across the world wide web as a fake science blog, and not a scientific journal—although, in fairness, there exists a number of sites praising the publisher, the "Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law."9.

A few micro-incidents that sought to stupefy the American public:

·         George W. Bushe’s favorite climate “expert,” novelist Michael Crichton. Left a legacy for the delight of conspiracy theorists on the level of RFK’s vaccine disinformation drive.10 His climate change denial still resonates with the “alternate facts” set, twenty-two years later.

·         America’s disconnect with reality was on full view when an untold number believed that the Democratic Party ran a child-trafficking ring out of a pizza restaurant in Washington, D.C. Such is the state of the nation’s critical thinking capabilities. Elon Musk widened the gap between reality and the gullible set when he revived the story in late 2023,11 proving once again that the wealthy are not smarter than you; only luckier.

·         The Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines "factoid" as "1: an invented fact believed to be true because it appears in print. 2: a briefly stated and usually trivial fact. Here, that definition is expanded to, a fact stripped of all nuance and context. Factoids are not usually used in the media, but they are effective in use among friends, relatives, and associates. In this sense, factoids are intended to produce specific inferences. Someone might tell you, in reference to undocumented immigrants sent to New York City, “The government gives illegal immigrants in New York City free luxury hotel rooms and credit cards. Credit cards!”

You are supposed to imagine hundreds of immigrants bound for El Salvador living in the Waldorf Astoria while shopping with their government-issued Platinum American Express cards. But you know that New York City has contracts with area hotels to hold several rooms for official visitors. It cost less to house immigrants there than to lease rooms anew. And those credit cards? Limited to use for food and baby supplies only. Your conspiracy-minded uncle neglected to divulge that part as it didn’t serve his narrative. That, or he was merely disinformed.

In that event, he was in large company.

##

 

Bibliography

1. Susan Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason (Pantheon Books, 2008) 18

1a. Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason, 22-23

1b. Jacoby, The Age of American Unreason, 25

2. Charles P. Pierce, Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free (Anchor Books, 2010)

3. Christine Leigh Heyrman, Department of History, University of Delaware, “The First Great Awakening,” ©National Humanities Center, Accessed April 22, 2025, https://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/tserve/eighteen/ekeyinfo/grawaken.htm

4. Susan Searls Giroux , “Between Race and Reason: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life,” Stanford University Press, September 16, 2011, https://truthout.org/articles/between-race-and-reason-antiintellectualism-in-american-life/

5. “Public’s Views on Human Evolution,” Pew Research Center, December 30, 2013, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/

5a. “Public Divided on Origins of Life: Religion A Strength and Weakness for Both Parties,” Pew Research Center, August 30, 2005, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2005/08/30/public-divided-on-origins-of-life/

6. A.C. Grayling, The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism (Bloomsbury, 2014) 111

7. Chris Mooney, The Republican War on Science (Basic Books, 2005) p.12

8. Junk Science, Bought and Paid For: The Latest Anti-Vaccine ‘Study’ is a Political Stunt, By Andrea Love, Ph.D. and Katie Suleta — Feb 07, 2025, https://www.acsh.org/news/2025/02/07/junk-science-bought-and-paid-latest-anti-vaccine-study-political-stunt-49291

9. Science, Public Health Policy & the Law – Bias and Credibility, "Overall, we rate Science, Public Health Policy & the Law as a pseudoscience source based on the frequent publication of vaccine misinformation to promote vaccine hesitancy. We also rate them Low for factual reporting due to false claims and inappropriate claims of being peer-reviewed." https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/science-public-health-policy-the-law-bias-and-credibility/

10. Michael Crichton, author of State of Fear, leaves global warming disinformation legacy, https://whistleblower.org/politicization-of-climate-science/global-warming-denial-machine/michael-crichton-author-of-state-of-fear-leaves-global-warming-disinformation-legacy/

11. Philip Marcelo, “Elon Musk and others spread meme reviving unfounded ‘pizzagate’ conspiracy theory,” November 29, 2023, https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-pizzagate-conspiracy-elon-musk-abc-657657139374

##

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Fact Sheet One

 

Photo by Microsoft 365 on Unsplash


Richard Sauber, special counsel to the president, has stated that Biden’s attorneys have cooperated with National Archives and Records Administration and the Department of Justice

14 January 2023

https://apnews.com/article/biden-classified-documents-trump-side-by-side-fb2c4ebccdbdbb9039c1c5e227b1da53

Following Trump’s failure to comply with the National Archives’ request for classified documents, the FBI had to obtain a search warrant to retrieve those documents from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

13 January 2023

https://time.com/6245949/biden-classified-documents-investigation/

##

The drive to circumvent or abolish the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment is coming along nicely.

https://www.usnews.com/topics/subjects/abortion

https://www.whitehouse.gov/about-the-white-house/our-government/the-constitution/#:~:text=The%20First%20Amendment%20provides%20that,the%20right%20to%20bear%20arms.

##

Efforts to a White Nationalist utopia are also in the works, but with some pushback.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-116hhrg36563/html/CHRG-116hhrg36563.htm

##

What is the opposite of “Woke”?

Asleep? Comatose? Brain dead?

slumbered. snoozed. retired. turned in. conked (off or out)?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/woke

https://www.foxnews.com/us/federal-judge-hands-desantis-admin-win-stop-woke-act

##

I am old enough to remember the civil rights movement, and the hateful acts and rhetoric from hate groups and hateful people.

https://www.pharostribune.com/news/article_bcd8a9de-92ab-11ed-826a-179e784dfbad.html

##

 

 

Saturday, January 8, 2022

For Want of a Theme

 


This blog has suffered through abandonment and fresh starts, indecision and neglect, and the lack of a theme. It is that need of a unifying theme that has had me stop and start so often. I began with politics, but soon saw that meant dealing with idiots, so I changed to religion and philosophy. That won’t work as a theme either. There is only so much I can say about the incredulity of religious claims.

I considered a “How to Clean” theme but, though a clean freak, I am no expert on the subject.

Architecture. That would be great. I do love the fields of art and architecture, but there is a problem: the cost of graphics. I cannot at this time afford the cost of images of those works on the internet.

So, I’ve chosen to blog with no theme. I have a wide variety of interests on which I think I have something to say. With no unifying theme, I can write about cleaning hacks, post-modern architecture, the current political climate and its threat to the democratic experiment, the military, books and literature, my own short stories and essays, and even the adventures of an amateur cook. The field is wide open.

In the coming days I will post a short story centered on illicit sex, another, a historical fiction featuring the Joseph McCarthy political with hunts of the 1950s, and a bio and review of one of my literary heroes.

I hope that the freedom to write a themeless blog will be as entertaining and informative as it is liberating.

##


Thursday, July 1, 2021

Power Grab

 

Photo by visuals on Unsplash


Power Grab

A contributor to the AZ Central news outlet summarizes the attack on voting rights by those who would deny those tights in favor of a supposed* strong man authoritarian rule selected by a "committee" of solely or predominately right-wing authoritarian voters. The erosion of voting rights and the recent rule of an incompetent but charismatic president signal the final days of the experiment in democracy.

With the ability to select which voters to give the strongest voice through voter suppression and gerrymandering, we can expect the future day in which we live under an essentially one-party rule with authoritarian rulers representing a segment of society at the helm. Those facing diminished representation might then see restrictions on free speech to cement the ruling party's grip on power.

The shutting down of alternative voices has worked well for religions for thousands of years. It creates the illusion that the words of the powerful are representative of reality through the Argument by Consensus. If a majority of people in a culture can be convinced that the consensus defines reality, rulers then have the minds of the people in their hands. That same procedure routinely puts despots and tyrants into positions of power, as we saw with abundant examples through the twentieth century.

A link to the AZ Central article:

Supreme Court upholds Arizona law, giving voter protections their last gasp





Monday, March 22, 2021

Snarl

 

Photo by Yosef Ariel on Unsplash

During times of economic hardship, the word “Utopian” emerges, usually spat out as a curse. The idea of a harmonious social and political order has devolved into a contemptible pipedream of radicals and revolutionaries. When I recently suggested that the enormous taxpayer funds spent to reinvigorate the economy might be better used helping the now insolvent common man—the taxpayer—with his upside-down mortgages and in retraining him for new and emerging technologies a listener responded with a snarl, “That’s utopian!” His loathing for my proposal was evident: his posture threatened combat, his face contorted in loathing. “Utopian” was evidently, to him, not a pleasant concept. How did a word suggesting a place of political, social, and economic perfection come to such low regard?

Sir Thomas More invented the word, loosely translated from Greek as “No place,” for his imaginary city in his book Utopia in 1516. Five hundred years later the rugged individualist American acquires his disdain for all things Utopian from the welfare state described by More and Utopian dreamers before and since him. We are more comfortable with the heroic stature of an Ayn Rand protagonist than with the idea of the citizen as a minor function in a vast socio-economic machine. A lone person struggling against great odds to amass wealth and fame is a worthy hero to a culture coming of age in an environment of war and celebrity. In that mindset, a contented drone is nevertheless a drone. Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932), describing a dysfunctional utopian future, continues to sell while his Island (1962), chronicling a near-perfect society on a remote south-seas island, remains an out-of-print book discussed only among bibliophiles and daydreamers.

Plato’s Republic, written 2,000 years before More’s work, did nothing to promote perfect social order as an attainable goal. His perfect world, ruled by a philosopher-king who was a model for Ayn Rand’s heroic industrial magnate, fares better among readers in the western world, though his handling of women as state property and the use of slaves leaves many readers squirming with unease. His was a Spartan world where a socialist economy prevailed, children were wards of the state, and art censored. The Republic served as Plato’s personal fantasy. It benefits the philosopher-king but is no Utopia to women and slaves.

Saint Augustine, too, promoted a Utopian vision. His Heavenly City on earth led to the founding of religious settlements seeking a perfect society of like-minded pilgrims, but those harmonious colonies soon disbanded, or deteriorated into villages and towns as messy and disordered as the ones we live in today or ended in disaster like the Jonestown Massacre. A common vision and shared belief, it seems, are not enough to maintain perfection.

Ursula K. Le Guin has experimented with the utopian ideal more than any other writer. In 1971, she published a short story describing a perfect society in “Those Who Walk Away From Omalon.” She sets up the reader with a pleasant world of carefree living, and then reveals the terrible price paid for the perfect society. Those who walked away from Omalon preferred the imperfect world of strife and insecurity over an easy life lived in guilt.

Huxley’s Island, James Hilton’s Shangri-La (from Lost Horizon, 1933), and Francis Bacon’s 1626 New Atlantis represent earthly paradises distant and isolated in time and place, and therefore of minor interest to modern utopists. However, to the casual reader they are pleasant fantasies, an escape from the monotonous grind of daily life in a dystopian reality. The desert island-hidden valley utopia rarely dwells on social-economic-political details, and that brand of utopian literature reads more like escapist fantasy than serious political discussion.

The collapse of the world economic system, ongoing culture wars, and the growing evidence of greed as the fuel that drove the good times have brought utopianism back into the political discussion as we seek a means to bring about “a more perfect union”-- a more stable economic environment. The depression of the 1930s brought socialism into the debate. Earlier economic crises, called “Panics” in their day, introduced such proletarian institutions as the labor union, the end of child labor, and migrations from agricultural to industrial centers. Each advance of socialist values has met resistance, often violent resistance, by mainstream society. The recent rise of utopian discussion fares no better.

Business and government leaders call for patience. They repeat with metronomic frequency the mantra that, when the bank vaults are full and failing industries revived, the benefits will trickle down to the rest of us. To which a growing number of Americans snarl, “That’s utopian!”

 

Suggested Reading

The Republic, Plato, 3rd century BC

The Confessions of Saint Augustine, c. 400 AD

Utopia, Sir Thomas More, 1516

New Atlantis, Francis Bacon, 1626

News From Nowhere, William Morris, 1890

Island, Aldous Huxley, 1932

Lost Horizon, James Hilton, 1933

Brave New World, Aldous Huxley, 1963

The Dispossessed; An Ambiguous Utopia, Ursula K. Le Guin, 1974

The Handmaid’s Tale, Margaret Atwood, 1985, 1986

 

Thursday, March 15, 2012

A Partisan's Journal

A Partisan's Journal


Saturday 10 March 2012

     I awoke one morning, simultaneously bored and irritated with the Republican Party's pandering to right-wing nut jobs. With each election cycle, the right dumbs down it message, offering ever more simplistic solutions to increasingly complex issues. I've come to see the anti-science, anti-intellectual disregard for reasoned thinking in a discussion cannot be countered with intelligent and rational debate. Partisan extremists understand only the shout-down and the Big Lie.
     My concern with right-wing political posturing lies in the use of the Big Lie and its heavy-handed use in the propaganda machine. Pseudo-historian David Barton represents the use of propaganda devices that would have won for him the admiration of the rulers of wartime Germany and cold war Russia. His outrageous claims--designed for the consumption of the gullible--about the motivations of the Founding Fathers reveal themselves on inspection as nothing more than fabricated and self-serving "facts." As a result, he has achieved stardom among the True Believers and those crippled by an inability to think critically or perceive the immorality of the use of made-up facts as a rhetorical tool.

Tuesday 13 March 2012

    Our ancestors and Founding Fathers have placed on us a sacred trust: to give an honest and fair appraisal of their lives and times. Any attempt to distort those lives in order to promote an ideology amounts to deception--a lie. It invalidates the lives of those who lived during the times the pseudo-historian alters for his benefit. If, at times, egalitarianism or authoritarianism, mass hysteria or noble pursuits ruled the zeitgeist, then let us see it for what it was, rather than what we wish it.
     People who would kill our history and those who came before us by replacing them with imaginary figures are too often the same people who tell us the lives of the unborn are sacred. They would have us believe that a zygote has a greater right to life than our ancestors. Their concern for life does not extend to those who have passed.

Thursday 15 March 2012
     A group of intellectually impaired Democratic Party members in Florida have decided it would be a good idea to fly an American flag emblazoned with the likeness of President Obama over their party headquarters. Did these geniuses not see that their action as playing into the right-wing propaganda machine? Could they not see that Americans, in general, worship symbols--graven images -- that they substitute for reality?
     The dufus who approved of the use of the flag in such manner is guilty of the crime of supreme stupidity. While all of us possess the right to do what we will with an object, as long as it does not harm others or endanger public safety, we might also regret the lack of rational thought in the people behind the action. If the Florida Democrats paid for the altered flag with their own money, it is their property to dispose of at their will and whim. We can forgive the method by which a group of partisans chooses to exercise their freedom of speech, but we can loathe their self-destructive intellect.